In my experiences in elementary
school, I do not remember having much science at all in our classrooms. When we
did have science, it was very short. I do not think they used Backward Design. Our
typical less is as follows: First my teachers explained the objective. Next,
they asked us questions about what we already knew. Then we worked to complete
an activity. Lastly, we took a test to see what we knew. This was a content
specific lesson plan… it was boring, and repetitive.
Thinking back to high school and even my college courses, I do not remember my teachers using backwards design. We came to class each day ready to take notes from the projector. Each day was the same routine, just new content. My teachers never described the goals for the day, or introduced new topics. Later always came the test. The test was a major part of our grade, it was all or nothing. You either knew the content, or you didn't. In these situations it would have been nice to have formative assessments to encourage me that I knew the material, but to also guide future instruction.
As a student, I remember
thinking that the objective was not really that helpful. I just thought of it
as a bunch of “fancy” words. It would have been more beneficial to think of
them as learning goals, and then the following instruction may have been more
relevant. It also would have helped it the teachers had set expectations for us
to follow throughout the lessons. I believe my teachers just stated the
objective because they were told to do so, but they were not measured or very
relevant to our learning.
No comments:
Post a Comment